The fact is that Sony implemented as much upgrades and improvements in their cameras within two years that Canon and Nikon did in twice or more time interval. Nothing stops you from making great pictures with your current gear. Are you blaming the manufacturer for your own psychological state of mind (difficulty with having to deal with GAS)? What’s exactly wrong with what Sony is doing? If you don’t like to upgrade, then simply don’t buy the newer models. I do not really understand the logic of this argument. Because by then both Canon and Nikon will have developed products that will allow them to let go of the designs that make them money and keep them in business today. I believe that in the next five years you’ll see a lot of working pros making the switch and in ten years the majority will have. I think DSLR’s at this point are a legacy system left over from the day when someone first stuck a CCD chip on the back of a 35mm film body. But just this week I sent my Nikon packing, selling it now before its value goes to zero.
However, not an issue for landscapers like you. I’ve held on to my Nikon DSLR for action stuff - fast focusing on a mirrorless still lags SLR’s a bit. I made the switch to mirrorless a couple of years ago, settling on the Fuji X-Series primarily because of their great lenses and discrete dials for important functions, making for less frequent menu access.
Sony a7 iii vs sony a6000 full#
I’m surprised you didn’t get your hands on a Sony A7 so that you could take full frame / crop factor out of the equation.
0 kommentar(er)
